comb-over

Example 6: Schiffman 90° phase shifter

Netlist: examples/schiffman-90.cir

Goal: a broadband 90° differential phase shifter at 2 GHz. It uses a coupled-line C-section against a uniform reference line, and shows how to compare two networks in one netlist and write an equality goal on a phase trace.

The structure

.param rho = 2.7866 tune 1.5 10      # rho = Z0e/Z0o
port a     # 1
port b     # 2
port r1    # 3
port r2    # 4
cline CS
  Zeo 50*sqrt(rho) 50/sqrt(rho)      # keeps sqrt(Z0e*Z0o) = 50
  len 90deg
  A a b                              # both ports at end A
  B j j                              # far ends joined: same node name on both lines
end
Tref r1 r2 Z0=50 len=270deg          # reference line
.goal ang(S21/S43) = 90 1.3G 2.7G
.plot title=Phase_difference_(deg) ang(S21/S43)

The C-section. The far ends of the two lines are joined simply by giving them the same node name j. This makes the pair a "C-section": a two-port whose ports are the two A ends.

Why it is matched at every frequency. With Z0e·Z0o = 50², the C-section is an all-pass network: matched at every frequency, with a phase that varies non-linearly. The tool shows S11 below −250 dB everywhere. Its transmission phase φ obeys the standard Schiffman relation

cos φ = (ρ − tan²θ) / (ρ + tan²θ)

The tool agrees exactly. For ρ = 2.7866, the formula gives φ = 61.8474° at 1 GHz and 110.6761° at 1.5 GHz. angu(S21) reads −61.8474° and −110.6761°, the minus sign being the phase-lag convention. Above f0, φ continues past 180° (−249.32° at 2.5 GHz).

The reference line. It is 270° long. The C-section's phase slope crosses the reference line's around f0, so the difference stays near 90° over a wide band.

Results

Phase difference
Phase difference

With ρ = 2.7866 (Z0e = 83.47 Ω, Z0o = 29.95 Ω), found by the optimiser from the = goal; measured on a 12 001-point sweep:

result
phase difference at f0 90.00°
over 1.3–2.7 GHz 86.80° … 93.20° (±3.2°)
within ±5° 1.250–2.750 GHz (2.20 : 1)
within ±2° 1.859–2.141 GHz (1.15 : 1)

Choosing ρ

ρ trades ripple against bandwidth. Larger ρ means tighter coupling and a steeper C-section phase; past an optimum it overshoots. The table below uses a 6001-point sweep. The ±5° band is the contiguous band around 2 GHz; the peak deviation is measured over 1.4–2.6 GHz.

ρ ±5° band ratio phase over 1.4–2.6 GHz
2.0 1.581–2.418 GHz 1.53 80.6°–99.4°
2.5 1.341–2.659 GHz 1.98 86.7°–93.3°
3.0 1.199–2.801 GHz 2.34 85.2°–94.8°
4.0 1.885–2.115 GHz 1.12 77.9°–102.1°
6.0 1.941–2.059 GHz 1.06 66.5°–113.5°

Of the values tried, ρ = 3.0 gives the widest ±5° band. By ρ = 4 the phase ripple exceeds ±5°, and the band collapses to a narrow region around f0.

The optimiser's ρ = 2.79 is lower than 3 because its goal is a least-squares-plus-peak fit over 1.3–2.7 GHz, not a maximised ±5° band. Your goal defines "best".

Try